Main | April 2008 »

March 2008

March 31, 2008

Son wins back inherited land worth $1.5 million

Jlb_photoA trust amendment that would have stripped a son of his right to inherit about 78 acres of farmland has been set aside after a trial court found that his sister had unduly influenced their ill mother.

On Sept. 20, 1993, Leander and Marie Moder executed the Leander and Marie Moder Living Trust. The couple’s son, William Moder, and one of their daughters, Mary E. Snipes, were to act as co-trustees.

The only assets in the trust were the home and farmland owned by the couple in House Springs, Mo. The 246.76 acres of farmland was split into three parcels. Two of the parcels, located north of Highway 30/Gravois, were commonly referred to as “the Farm”; one was 96.98 acres and the other 78.51 acres. Under the terms of the trust, the couple’s son was to inherit the two parcels. Except for a tour of duty in Vietnam, Moder worked on the farm his entire life.

According to the trust, the third parcel of land, 71.27 acres located south of Highway 30, was to be inherited by the couple’s daughter Barbara Brison. Finally, the trust stated that the Moders’ other daughter, Snipes, was to receive 1.5 acres of the property north of Highway 30, as well as the home on the property.

Leander Moder died in January 1999. After her husband’s death, Marie Moder began to decline both physically and mentally, and she became increasingly worried about upsetting Brison. In July 1999, Brison opened up a joint checking account with her mother, who could no longer read bank statements because of her deteriorating eyesight. By 2001, Brison was writing and signing all of her mother’s checks.  By 2002, Brison was attending to all of Marie Moder’s financial affairs.

In October 2001, Marie Moder broke her right hip. Brison informed one of her mother’s doctors that Moder “does have some periods of cognitive impairment.” In November 2001, Brison obtained power of attorney over Moder. The attorney who prepared the document never spoke with Moder; he was also absent when the document was signed. Brison did not tell her brother or sister that she had obtained power of attorney over their mother.

After Moder broke her hip, witnesses testified, her health continued to deteriorate. One witness testified that “the lights were on, but nobody was home.”  On April 24, 2002, Moder was declared legally blind.

On Sept. 19, 2002, Marie Moder amended the trust. Her son would no longer receive both parcels of land under the terms of the amended trust. Instead, the 78.51-acre parcel of land, which plaintiffs estimated to be valued in excess of  $1 million, was granted to Brison’s three sons, two of whom had left Missouri 15 to 20 years earlier.

The document was drafted by a now-disbarred attorney who met with Moder only once, on the day she signed the document. The attorney testified that he thought that Brison’s children all still lived in the area and that he was unaware that Moder had other grandchildren. In fact, William Moder and Mary Snipes each have two children.

The attorney only met with Moder for about half an hour, while in Brison’s presence, and did not learn that Moder was blind until she was unable to find the signature line on the document. Brison did not tell her brother, her sister, or her sons about the trust amendment. The attorney and Brison discussed the amendment with Moder, who was also hard of hearing.

Marie Moder died on June 8, 2004. It was only after her death that Snipes and William Moder became aware of the amendment. Snipes resigned as trustee soon after her mother’s death, and William Moder became the sole trustee.

William Moder and Mary Snipes sued Barbara Brison and her three sons in Jefferson County Circuit Court on Oct. 26, 2005, seeking to invalidate the amendment. They alleged that Moder lacked the testamentary capacity to execute the amendment. They also alleged that the amendment was invalid because it was the result of Brison’s undue influence over their mother. The plaintiffs were represented by Matthew J. Rossiter and Jamie L. Boock of the St. Louis law firm Rossiter & Boock.

Brison filed a counterclaim against Moder, alleging that he breached his fiduciary duty to the trust when he issued a special warranty deed to Brison for the disputed property. She also sought his removal as trustee and sought one-third of a certificate of deposit established with funds used to cover trust expenses.

The case went to trial before Jefferson County Circuit Court Judge Robert Wilkens. On Dec. 12, 2007, Judge Wilkens issued a 23-page ruling in which he noted that William Moder and Barbara Brison had never been close and that they did not have a good relationship during their mother’s illness. He concluded that Brison had unduly influenced her mother and that Marie Moder had lacked the testamentary capacity to execute the amendment.

Judge Wilkens invalidated the amendment and also ruled against Brison on all of her counterclaims.

Elderly couple hurt in highway crash reach $600K settlement

Brad_blakeAn elderly couple injured after their pickup collided first with a service truck parked in a highway lane and then with a tractor-trailer have settled their personal injury claims for $600,000.

On Jan. 24, 2006, a service truck owned by Trucking Company One was southbound on Interstate 55 near Arnold, Mo. A ladder on the service truck fell off, and the driver stopped his truck in the middle of the highway lane, instead of pulling onto the shoulder, to retrieve it.

At about 1 p.m., John Doe, 81, and his wife, Mary, also 81, were southbound on the highway. When John Doe unexpectedly came upon the parked service truck in the middle of his highway lane, he tried to move over to the right, but his attempt was blocked by two 18-wheelers: a phantom truck followed closely by a semi owned by Trucking Company Two.   

The Does’ vehicle struck the right rear of the service truck and spun into the right lane. Trucking Company Two’s tractor-trailer then smashed into the driver’s side of the Does’ vehicle.

John and Mary Doe sustained life-threatening injuries in the accident and were taken to St. Anthony’s Medical Center after the accident.

Mary Doe sustained rib fractures, multiple pelvic fractures and a lacerated liver. She was hospitalized for 32 days and experienced several serious medical complications, including acute respiratory failure, a buildup of bloody fluid in her chest cavity that had to be drained with the use of a needle and two chest tubes, the potentially fatal condition known as pneumothorax, pneumonia, hemorrhagic shock, anemia and aggravated depression.

After she was discharged, Mary Doe remained at her home in Cape Girardeau for only three days before being admitted to Southeast Hospital for another nine days. She continues to suffer pain as a result of her pelvic injuries, her preexisting anxiety and depression have become difficult to manage since the crash, and her physicians testified that overall functioning has declined by approximately 15 to 20 percent.

John Doe was hospitalized for 22 days. He sustained several broken ribs and three lumbar fractures. Like his wife, John Doe endured a variety of complications while hospitalized, including acute respiratory failure, a buildup of bloody fluid in his chest cavity that had to be drained with the use of a needle, pneumonia, an intestinal obstruction and anemia.

After his discharge, John Doe struggled with rehabilitation, and he was eventually admitted to a nursing home for four weeks of intensive therapy. Although Doe walked unassisted before the accident, he now requires a walker and cane. Before the accident, Doe had successfully completed all the tests needed that would have qualified him for a kidney transplant. As a result of the injuries he sustained in the crash, he did not requalify for a transplant until 20 months after the accident. According to his physicians, his overall functioning has declined by about 20 percent.

John and Mary Doe filed a personal injury lawsuit against Trucking Company One and its driver, as well as Trucking Company Two and its driver, in St. Louis County Circuit Court on Nov. 28, 2006. They were represented by Brad L. Blake of the St. Louis law firm Fellows & Blake.

The Does alleged that the Trucking Company One and its driver were negligent when the driver parked his truck in the middle of a busy interstate. They also alleged that parking in the middle of a highway demonstrated a conscious disregard for the safety of others and merited punitive damages.

The Does claimed that Trucking Company One and its driver were negligent because the ladder was not properly secured to the truck, a weathered cord was used to tie the ladder to the truck, and two tiedowns were not used to secure the ladder, even though federal regulations require them.

In their claims against Trucking Company Two and its driver, the Does alleged that the driver was following too closely behind the phantom 18-wheeler. They also alleged that if the trucks had been farther apart, the Trucking Company Two driver could have avoided crashing into them. Finally, the Does alleged that the company failed to adequately train its driver.

The defendants denied the allegations. They asserted that the Does were speeding and that their inattentiveness caused the accident. However, the event-data recorder on the Does’ pickup revealed that the vehicle was going just 40 mph when it struck the service truck.

The plaintiffs’ accident-reconstruction expert testified in a deposition that a motorist’s chances of coming upon a vehicle parked in the middle of a highway were 1 in 1.8 million. Because this would have been such an unusual and unexpected event, it would have been difficult for most drivers to perceive that the service truck was stopped.

The case was mediated by Circuit Judge William Corrigan on Jan. 15. Without admitting liability, Trucking Company One agreed to pay the couple $540,000 to settle their claims. Trucking Company Two agree to pay the couple $60,000. The settlement was finalized on Feb. 6.

March 27, 2008

MLW’s article of the week

John_simon A $1.8 million judgment won by John Simon and Jeff Roseman of Simon Passanante is featured as Missouri Lawyers Weekly's article of the week.

On Dec. 31, 2002, Tyrone McWell, a unit driver for U-Haul, was traveling southbound on Interstate 70/55 in St. Louis in a U-Haul truck. As he neared the Poplar Street Bridge, the truck threw a rod and broke down in the left lane of traffic.

Mohammad Othman was also traveling southbound on Interstate 70/55. When he moved into the left lane in order to pass a tractor-trailer, Othman collided with the stalled U-Haul truck and the semi. Othman suffered a closed-head injury in the accident.

Othman filed a negligence lawsuit against U-Haul Co. of Missouri and McWell in St. Louis City Circuit Court. Simon and Roseman represented Othman.

Othman alleged that McWell failed to turn on the U-Haul truck’s emergency flashers, failed to set out emergency triangles, failed to call 911 and failed to move the truck over to the right-hand side as far as possible. He also alleged that the U-Haul failed to properly maintain the vehicle by not checking the oil on a regular basis. 

After an eight-day trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Othman for $1.8 million. The jury assessed 30 percent fault to Othman for the accident which reduced the verdict to $1,277,500.

March 20, 2008

Florida residents join suit against owner of Joiner Landfill

Todd_hagemanNEWS RELEASE

Milton, Fla. – Forty-nine residents living near the Joiner Landfill have been added to a nuisance and negligence lawsuit filed against Milton-based Joiner Fill Dirt LLC.

The Joiner Landfill was opened as a repository for construction and demolition debris. After Hurricanes Ivan and Dennis, the landfill received gypsum-drywall debris, which produces hydrogen sulfide gas as it degrades. Exposure to hydrogen sulfide—which gives rotten eggs their characteristic foul smell—causes burning eyes, headaches, nausea, fatigue and respiratory problems.

The landfill’s owner, Joiner Fill Dirt LLC, allegedly failed to follow state landfill regulations and permit conditions. As a result, an excessive amount of hydrogen sulfide has been produced at the facility—at times the concentration of the gas measured in landfill fissures has been 43,000 times higher than the odor threshold recognized by the state department of health—and the poor conditions have allegedly caused multiple landfill fires.

On March 30, 2007, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection filed suit against Joiner Fill Dirt in Santa Rosa County Circuit Court, alleging that the landfill owner violated permit conditions and Florida rules and regulations. Specifically, the FDEP claimed that Joiner Fill Dirt failed to apply cover soil on a weekly basis, openly burned solid waste, racked up numerous odor violations and violated particulate-matter regulations. 

On March 18, a lawsuit filed in the Santa Rosa County Circuit Court, First Judicial Circuit, by nearby residents against Joiner Fill Dirt over the landfill conditions was amended. Forty-nine residents were added to the lawsuit, which alleges that the owners’ actions have resulted in physical reactions from exposure and loss of use and enjoyment of their property. There are now 90 plaintiffs in total.

The plaintiffs are represented by Jacksonville, Fla.-based attorneys Van Kirk McCombs of The Law Offices of Van Kirk McCombs II, Todd Hageman of St. Louis-based Simon Passanante, and Tracy P. Moye of the Tallahassee, Fla.-based Moye Law Firm. For more information, contact Van Kirk McCombs at 904-353-1555.

###

Media contact: Geri L. Dreiling
Legal Media Matters LLC
314-743-3851 or 314-520-3897
legalmediamatters@sbcglobal.net

March 19, 2008

$6.1 million judgment against Countrywide left largely intact

Dave_butsch_2NEWS RELEASE

March 19, 2008

St. Louis – A Missouri Supreme Court ruling has left largely intact a $6.1 million judgment against Countrywide Home Loans for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. 

The court unanimously held yesterday in Carpenter, et al. v. Countrywide Home Loans that homeowners who paid a document-preparation fee to Countrywide within two years of filing suit were entitled to treble damages. However, the court said, they were not entitled to prejudgment interest.

The court also ruled that homeowners who paid the document-preparation fee to Countrywide between three and five years before filing suit were entitled to actual damages and prejudgment interest.

In December 2006, St. Louis County Circuit Court Judge Gary M. Gaertner Jr. awarded homeowners $2.6 million in actual damages, approximately $931,000 in prejudgment interest, more than $2.6 million in treble damages and postjudgment interest at the statutory annual rate of 9 percent.

Clayton-based firm of Green Jacobson & Butsch represented the homeowners. David T. Butsch, an attorney with the firm, said that even with the deduction of prejudgment interest, once postjudgment interest is calculated, the final award could reach $6.5 million.

The lawsuit was filed in 2002 on behalf of 16,852 homeowners whose loans were closed five years before suit was filed. The homeowners claimed that Countrywide engaged in the unauthorized practice of law when it charged a fee to prepare legal documents to complete mortgage-loan transactions.

Clayton-based Green Jacobson & Butsch, P.C. is a boutique law firm that represents the legal interests of private and publicly owned businesses. For more information, contact David T. Butsch at 314-862-6800 or by e-mail at Butsch@stlouislaw.com

###

Media contact: Geri L. Dreiling
Legal Media Matters LLC
314.743.3851 or 314.520.3897
legalmediamatters@sbcglobal.net

First suit over Trasylol filed in Missouri

J0321155 The first of what is expected to be many lawsuits against Bayer Corp., maker of the clotting drug Trasylol, has been filed in Missouri, the St. Louis Daily Record reports.

The suit was filed on March 10 by the St. Louis-based based Carey & Danis on behalf of a widow, Genevieve Nakis, whose husband died of kidney failure after open-heart surgery. The Lowe Law Firm, also of St. Louis, is working of counsel on the case.

On Dec. 16, 2005, Samuel Nakis, 81, underwent open-heart surgery at St. Luke’s Hospital in Chesterfield, Mo. During the surgery he was given Trasylol (also known as aprotinin), a clotting drug used to prevent bleeding. Shortly after the surgery, Nakis experienced kidney failure and underwent dialysis. He died a short time later.

In an interview with reporter Donna Walter, Joseph Danis said, “Knowledge is the key factor. We have to prove that Bayer knew of the risks and should have warned of them.”

That’s a standard the attorneys believe they can meet. In addition to recently released studies linking Trasylol to kidney failure and death, Jeff Lowe notes, “There have been reports of problems going back quite a bit even before it was on the market in the United States.”

According to the front-page story, which appeared in the March 13 issue of the Record, about 25 plaintiffs have signed up as Carey & Danis clients to pursue claims against Bayer involving Trasylol.

March 14, 2008

Lawsuit filed against the maker of Trasylol over man’s death after open-heart surgery

John_careyNEWS RELEASE

March 14, 2008

St. Louis – A lawsuit has been filed in a St. Louis federal court against Bayer AG, the maker of the anti-bleeding drug Trasylol, on behalf of a widow whose husband died of kidney failure after open-heart surgery.

On Dec. 16, 2005, Samuel Nakis, 81, underwent open-heart surgery at St. Luke’s Hospital in Chesterfield, Mo. During the surgery he was given Trasylol (also known as aprotinin), a clotting drug used to prevent bleeding. Shortly after the surgery, Nakis experienced kidney failure and underwent dialysis. He died a short time later.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Trasylol in 1993. On Jan. 20, 2006, the medical journal Transfusion published an article suggesting a link between Trasylol and renal toxicity. Later that same month, the New England Journal of Medicine published an article, by Dr. Dennis Mangano of the nonprofit Ischemia Research and Education Foundation, linking Trasylol to a higher risk of stroke, heart attack and kidney failure.

In the fall of 2006, an FDA advisory board met to decide whether the warning on Trasylol needed to be changed. At the meeting, Bayer failed to disclose the findings of a Trasylol study it had funded. That study, conducted by Dr. Alexander Walker, a professor at the Harvard School of Public Health, reviewed the hospital records of 67,000 patients and found that those given Trasylol had a risk of death 64 percent higher than that of patients who received a comparison drug. It wasn’t until November 2007 that the drug was finally pulled from the market.

On Feb. 21, the New England Journal of Medicine released the study conducted by Walker and a second study conducted by Duke University Medical Center researchers. Both confirmed that patients given Trasylol during heart surgery were more likely to die than patients given a comparable drug.

A lawsuit was filed by Nakis’ widow, Genevieve Nakis, on March 10 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. She is represented by John J. Carey of Carey & Danis and Jeffrey J. Lowe of The Lowe Law Firm.

The suit alleges that Bayer failed to warn prescribers and consumers of the dangers associated with the drug, defectively designed the drug, fraudulently concealed the dangers of the drug, breached the implied and express warranties and violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act.  The suit seeks compensatory damages and damages for aggravating circumstances.

Carey & Danis, LLC is a national law firm based in St. Louis that aids victims of corporate abuse, greed and neglect. For more information, contact John J. Carey or Joseph Danis at 314-725-7700 or e-mail jcarey@careydanis.com.

###

Media Contact: Geri L. Dreiling
Legal Media Matters LLC
314.743.3851 or 314.520.3897
legalmediamatters@sbcglobal.net

March 13, 2008

The cleanup after the cleanup

J0406954When Hurricanes Ivan and Dennis hit Florida, they left in their wake shattered homes and businesses. The rubble was hauled away during the cleanup and rebuilding process and some of it wound up in the Saufley Landfill, located in Pensacola, Fla.

The debris included gypsum drywall, which produces hydrogen sulfide as it degrades. Had the landfill been properly managed, the emission of hydrogen sulfide—which gives rotten eggs their foul smell and causes burning eyes, headaches, nausea, fatigue and respiratory problems—could have been controlled.

Instead, it is alleged in a lawsuit filed by residents of the area around the landfill, the reckless and negligent operation of the Saufley facility allowed the hydrogen sulfide level to rise so high that the landfill was eventually declared a public-health hazard.

On Tuesday the Pensacola News Journal reported on a mass tort lawsuit filed against the former operator of the landfill. Jacksonville lawyer Van Kirk McCombs II, along with Todd Hageman of St. Louis-based Simon Passanante and Tracy P. Moye of the Tallahassee, Fla.-based Moye Law Firm, represents the residents in the lawsuit. McCombs told PNJ reporter Michael Stewart:

“It really is a situation that could have been prevented and never should have gotten to the point where we are at today.”

On Wednesday the PNJ detailed the health problems of a teenager who lives near the landfill. The young man suffers from asthma so severe that he missed an entire year of high school. 

Local ABC News affiliate WEAR-TV (Channel 3) also carried a story on the latest Saufley Landfill developments.

A major inconvenience

J0430638 The latest issue of the Civil Litigator is out and one case highlighted involves a property damage claim filed in St. Louis County. A convenience store owner sued his landlord after a severe sewer backup allegedly damaged the convenience store’s equipment and inventory. The store owner claimed that the sewer had not been properly maintained. It took a jury less than three hours to agree with the convenience store owner and award him $29,530 in damages.

March 11, 2008

Saufley Landfill ordered closed; nearby residents join lawsuit

Todd_hageman NEWS RELEASE

March 11, 2008
Florida officials order hazardous landfill containing hurricane debris closed; nearby residents join suit against landfill owners

Pensacola, Fla. – The Florida Department of Environmental Protection has declared that the Saufley Landfill in Pensacola, Fla., is abandoned and will oversee the facility’s closure. In addition, 97 residents living near the landfill have been added as plaintiffs in a separate lawsuit filed against the owners.

The Saufley Landfill was opened on Jan. 31, 2005, as a repository for construction and demolition debris. After Hurricanes Ivan and Dennis the landfill received gypsum-drywall debris, which produces hydrogen sulfide gas as it degrades. Exposure to hydrogen sulfide—which gives off the foul smell of rotten eggs—causes burning eyes, headaches, nausea, fatigue and respiratory problems.

The landfill’s owners, Louisiana Investment Group LLC and Coastwide Disaster Relief & Recovery LLC, allegedly failed to follow state landfill regulations and permit conditions. As a result, an excessive amount of hydrogen sulfide has been produced at the facility—at times the concentration of the gas has been 22 times higher than the odor threshold recognized by the state department of health—and the poor conditions have allegedly caused multiple landfill fires.

Because of the excessive hydrogen sulfide levels, the Saufley Landfill was declared a public-health hazard to nearby residents. On March 4, after four contempt orders had been issued against the landfill’s owner, the FDEP entered an Order of Abandonment against LIG, concluding that it was unable to bring the landfill into regulatory compliance and could not carry out the long-term care that was needed. LIG has 21 days after receiving the order to file an administrative hearing petition.

On March 7, a lawsuit filed by nearby residents against LIG and Coastwide Disaster Relief and Recovery over the landfill conditions was amended. Ninety-seven additional residents were added to the negligence and nuisance lawsuit, which alleges that the owners’ actions have resulted in respiratory illness and physical discomfort on the part of the residents and loss of use and enjoyment of the residents’ property.

The plaintiffs are represented by Jacksonville, Fla.-based attorney Van Kirk McCombs of The Law Offices of Van Kirk McCombs II, Todd Hageman of St. Louis-based Simon Passanante and Tracy P. Moye of the Tallahassee, Fla.-based Moye Law Firm. For more information, contact Van Kirk McCombs at 904-353-1555.

###

Media contact: Geri L. Dreiling
Legal Media Matters LLC
314-743-3851 or 314-520-3897
legalmediamatters@sbcglobal.net

Blog powered by TypePad

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AdSense